Having the strengths and weaknesses of Oracle, IBM, and Microsoft helps us notice the similarities and differences that these competitors face within themselves. These are internal forces that each company faces and uses to grow. This analysis is made so the firms know what they are doing well and build off that to continue doing well. It is also made so the company knows what it lacks in and can correct weaknesses in order to remain competitive and effective.
Next we have to look at what these results are based off of and what they really mean. For example all three competitors mention research and development as one of their strengths but we have to look more in-depth and figure out what about research and development is so important. The below chart will supply information from the EBSCO database with what Oracle uses to help create its SWOT analysis.
|
The statistics from strengths of Oracle have to be next compared to those of its competitors to really tell whether they are strengths or possibly weaknesses. Oracle’s strategic management should strive to make their strengths the competition’s weaknesses.
Related articles
- Oracle and the Competition (robertbunda.com)
- Larry Ellison’s Top 10 Objectives For Oracle OpenWorld (forbes.com)
- Oracle unveils new servers in push against IBM (seattlepi.com)
- Oracle Seeks Sun Revival With Sparc T4 Servers (informationweek.com)
- The $800M question: What’s the difference between trademark and copyright? (venturebeat.com)
